Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Ward v. Saint Genevieve Sheriff Medical Staff

United States District Court, E.D. Missouri, Southeastern Division

February 20, 2018

JAMES ROBERT WARD, Plaintiff,
v.
SAINT GENEVIEVE SHERIFF MEDICAL STAFF, et al., Defendants.

          OPINION, MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

          HENRY EDWARD AUTREY, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE.

         This matter is before the Court upon the motion of plaintiff James Robert Ward (registration no. 506994), an inmate at Moberly Correctional Center, for leave to commence this action without payment of the required filing fee. For the reasons stated below, the Court finds that plaintiff does not have sufficient funds to pay the entire filing fee and will assess an initial partial filing fee of $15.55. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(b)(1). Furthermore, based upon a review of the complaint, the Court finds that the complaint should be dismissed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B).

         28 U.S.C. § 1915(b)(1)

         Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(b)(1), a prisoner bringing a civil action in forma pauperis is required to pay the full amount of the filing fee. If the prisoner has insufficient funds in his or her prison account to pay the entire fee, the Court must assess and, when funds exist, collect an initial partial filing fee of 20 percent of the greater of (1) the average monthly deposits in the prisoner's account, or (2) the average monthly balance in the prisoner's account for the prior six-month period. After payment of the initial partial filing fee, the prisoner is required to make monthly payments of 20 percent of the preceding month's income credited to the prisoner's account. 28 U.S.C. § 1915(b)(2). The agency having custody of the prisoner will forward these monthly payments to the Clerk of Court each time the amount in the prisoner's account exceeds $10, until the filing fee is fully paid. Id.

         Plaintiff has submitted an affidavit and a certified copy of his prison account statement for the six-month period immediately preceding the submission of his complaint. A review of plaintiff's account indicates an average monthly deposit of $77.79. Plaintiff has insufficient funds to pay the entire filing fee. Accordingly, the Court will assess an initial partial filing fee of $15.55, which is 20 percent of plaintiff's average monthly deposit.

         28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)

         Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B), the Court may dismiss a complaint filed in forma pauperis if the action is frivolous, malicious, fails to state a claim upon which relief can be granted, or seeks monetary relief against a defendant who is immune from such relief. An action is frivolous if “it lacks an arguable basis in either law or in fact.” Neitzke v. Williams, 490 U.S. 319, 328 (1989). An action is malicious when it is undertaken for the purpose of harassing litigants and not for the purpose of vindicating a cognizable right. Spencer v. Rhodes, 656 F.Supp. 458, 461-63 (E.D. N.C. 1987), aff'd 826 F.2d 1059 (4th Cir. 1987).

         To determine whether an action fails to state a claim upon which relief can be granted, the Court must engage in a two-step inquiry. First, the Court must identify the allegations in the complaint that are not entitled to the assumption of truth. Ashcroft v. Iqbal, 129 S.Ct. 1937, 1950-51 (2009). These include “legal conclusions” and “[t]hreadbare recitals of the elements of a cause of action [that are] supported by mere conclusory statements.” Id. at 1949. Second, the Court must determine whether the complaint states a plausible claim for relief. Id. at 1950-51. This is a “context-specific task that requires the reviewing court to draw on its judicial experience and common sense.” Id. at 1950. The plaintiff is required to plead facts that show more than the “mere possibility of misconduct.” Id. The Court must review the factual allegations in the complaint “to determine if they plausibly suggest an entitlement to relief.” Id. at 1951. When faced with alternative explanations for the alleged misconduct, the Court may exercise its judgment in determining whether plaintiff's proffered conclusion is the most plausible or whether it is more likely that no misconduct occurred. Id. at 1950, 1951-52.

         The Complaint

         Plaintiff James Robert Ward, an inmate at Moberly Correctional Center, brings this action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 alleging violations of his civil rights that purportedly occurred during his incarceration at Saint Genevieve County Jail. Plaintiff names as defendants in this action: Saint Genevieve Sheriff's Department Medical Staff; Saint Genevieve Sheriff's Department Jail Staff; and Public Defenders Jason Michael Emmons and Edward Loftus. Plaintiff sues defendants in their official and individual capacities.

         During the time plaintiff was being held at Saint Genevieve County Jail as a pretrial detainee, he was awaiting trial on state criminal charges in Saint Genevieve County, Missouri, for a Class C felony of possession of controlled substance (methamphetamine), driving while his license had been suspended and/or revoked, resisting a lawful traffic stop, failure to yield to an emergency vehicle, exceeding the posted speed limit, failing to drive on the right side of the road, failing to drive without proper lighting and failing to properly signal. See State v. Ward, No. 15SG-CR01256 (24th Judicial Circuit, Saint Genevieve County Court). He was represented in his criminal action by public defenders Jason Michael Emmons and Edward Loftus. Plaintiff eventually decided to plead guilty, in a plea deal with the prosecution, on June 20, 2017, to two counts of the Indictment: possession of a controlled substance and driving while his license was suspended and/or revoked. He was sentenced to a total term of imprisonment of five (5) years in the Missouri Department of Corrections. See State v. Ward, No. 15SG-CR01256-01 (24thJudicial Circuit, Saint Genevieve County Court).

         In the present action, plaintiff asserts that he received ineffective assistance of counsel from defendants Emmons and Loftus during his state criminal trial. Plaintiff claims that both Loftus and Emmons failed to pursue requesting his mental health records and Veterans' Association records, “which prolonged his medical needs.” Plaintiff claims that he had discussed his mental health needs with both Emmons and Loftus, but both attorneys failed to pursue his mental health needs in his criminal case.

         Plaintiff asserts that two nurses at Saint Genevieve County Jail, Melissa Puckett and Barbara O'Dem refused to release copies of his Veterans Association medical records to his public defenders without plaintiff's consent and without his payment for the copies. Plaintiff appears to believe that this was a violation of his Constitutional rights. He claims that this “delayed his cancer treatment, ” but he does not explain his conclusory statement. Plaintiff also does not explain when he had cancer or what type of cancer he had or if he was receiving treatment for his cancer.

         Last, plaintiff asserts that the intake officer at Saint Genevieve County Jail, Daniel McCaffrey, “put him in harm's way, ” by failing to do a comprehensive mental health exam at intake. Plaintiff asserts that this resulted in his placement in general population. Plaintiff does not state that he had ...


Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.