Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Straub v. Progressive Preferred Insurance Co.

United States District Court, W.D. Missouri, Central Division

March 1, 2017

NATHANIEL STRAUB, Plaintiff,
v.
PROGRESSIVE PREFERRED INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendant.

          ORDER

          NANETTE K. LAUGHREY United States District Judge.

         Defendant Progressive Preferred Insurance Company moves the Court for an order joining Eric Breusch as a Counterclaim-Defendant to Progressive's declaratory judgment action. [Doc. 3]. For the following reasons, the motion is granted, and pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 19(a)(2), the Court orders that Eric Breusch be joined as a party.

         I. Background

         This lawsuit arises out of an automobile accident that occurred on September 15, 2013, when a vehicle operated by Nathaniel Straub collided with Eric Breusch as he was jogging. Straub's automobile insurance policy with Progressive Preferred Insurance Company provided bodily injury liability limits of $25, 000 per person/$50, 000 per accident.

         Following the accident, Breusch filed a personal injury suit, Breusch v. Straub, against Straub in state court, and Progressive provided a defense to Straub. Straub, Breusch, and Progressive negotiated and signed a Settlement Agreement, pursuant to which a judgment was entered in the amount of $2, 006, 780.00 plus interest accrued. Under the Settlement, Breusch agreed to forbear on his right to collect by execution, garnishment, or otherwise against the personal assets of Straub, and would instead pursue judgment against Progressive. Also under the Settlement Agreement, Straub agreed to pursue such claim or assign to Breusch all rights, actions, and causes of action Straub purports to have or may have against Progressive arising out of Progressive's handling of the Breusch claim and underlying lawsuit against Straub.

         Later, Straub filed for Chapter 7 bankruptcy, titled In re: Nathaniel and Sarah Straub. Straub's bankruptcy trustee filed a motion to compromise controversy and approve settlement, enclosing a settlement agreement negotiated by the trustee/Straub and Breusch, which the bankruptcy court granted. In this settlement, Straub and Breusch agreed to pursue Progressive for the $2, 006, 780.00 judgment in the underlying action, plus interest and costs from Progressive. Pursuant to the settlement agreement, Straub assigned certain claims to Breusch but retained others under the Progressive policy so that both Straub and Breusch purport to have claims against Progressive arising from the underlying claim, lawsuit, and/or judgment.

         Straub filed the present action against Progressive in Cole County, Missouri for declaratory relief, injunctive relief, and damages under Straub's Progressive policy. Straub seeks a declaration that he is entitled to the Progressive claim file related to the Breusch insurance claim, and he also seeks punitive damages and attorneys' fees. On February 9, 2017, Defendant Progressive removed the action to this Court and simultaneously filed its Answer and a Counterclaim Complaint for Declaratory Judgment against Straub and Breusch, who is not a party to this action. In its Counterclaim Complaint, Defendant/Counterclaim Plaintiff Progressive seeks a declaration that it acted lawfully under its Policy in handling the Breusch claim and lawsuit, as well as that it is not liable to Breusch or Straub for any damages claimed in the state court Settlement Agreement, the bankruptcy Settlement Agreement, or for the judgment entered in the underlying state court action.

         At the same time that Progressive removed this case and filed its counterclaim, Progressive filed a motion to joint Breusch as a Counterclaim-Defendant, pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 19(a)(1)(A), 19(a)(1)(B), and/or 20(a)(2). Straub did not respond to the motion. Therefore, the motion is fully briefed and ready for disposition.

         II. Discussion

         Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 19 governs the required joinder of parties and states in relevant part:

(a) Persons Required to Be Joined if Feasible
(1) Required Party. A person who is subject to service of process and whose joinder will not deprive the court of subject-matter jurisdiction must be joined as a party if:
(A) in that person's absence, the court cannot accord complete relief among existing parties; or
(B) that person claims an interest relating to the subject of the action and is so situated that disposing of the action in ...

Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.