Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Jiang v. Porter

United States District Court, E.D. Missouri, Eastern Division

January 11, 2017

REV. XIU HUI “JOSEPH” JIANG, Plaintiff,
v.
TONYA LEVETTE PORTER, et al., Defendants.

          MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

          CAROL E. JACKSON, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

         This matter is before the Court on the motion of plaintiff Xiu Hui “Joseph” Jiang to quash a subpoena or, alternatively, for a protective order. The subpoena was served by defendant N.M. on an attorney who previously represented N.M. in this case and who also represented a woman (referred to as “Jane Doe 119”) who made accusations of sexual abuse against plaintiff. No response to the motion has been filed, and the time allowed for doing so has expired.

         Plaintiff argues that the subpoena seeks materials that are irrelevant. In light of the claims asserted against N.M., it does not appear that requested documents concerning Jane Doe 119 have any bearing on any issue involved in this case. In correspondence between the parties, defendant N.M. admits lacking knowledge of relevance of the requested documents. Further, N.M. has not responded to the plaintiff's argument, and thus has failed to demonstrate that the subpoena seeks relevant information. [Doc. 199-2, p. 2]. See Hale v. Whole Foods Mkt. Grp., Inc., No. 4:12CV01490 AGF, 2014 WL 2158411, at *3 (E.D. Mo. May 23, 2014) (citing Hofer v. Mack Trucks, Inc., 981 F.2d 377, 380 (8th Cir.1992)) (some ...


Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.