Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Layton v. Frontline Asset Strategies, LLC

United States District Court, E.D. Missouri, Eastern Division

August 5, 2016

CAROLINE LAYTON, Plaintiff,
v.
FRONTLINE ASSET STRATEGIES, LLC, and MAIN STREET ACQUISITION CORP., Defendants.

          MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

          AUDREY G. FLEISSIG UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE.

         This action for statutory damages brought under the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act (“FDCPA”), 15 U.S.C. §§ 1692-1692p, is before the Court on the motion of Defendants Frontline Asset Strategies, LLC (“Frontline”) and Main Street Acquisition Corp. (“Main Street”) for partial dismissal of Plaintiff’s complaint for failure to state a claim. The only issue presented is whether a debt collector violates the FDCPA by seeking to collect post-judgment interest on an unpaid Missouri judgment in a nontort case where the state court judgment itself did not award such interest. For the reasons set forth below, the Court answers that question in the negative, and will, accordingly, grant Defendants’ motion for partial dismissal.

         BACKGROUND

         Accepting Plaintiff’s factual allegations as true for purposes of this motion, the record establishes the following. On December 6, 2010, Main Street filed a collection lawsuit against Plaintiff in Missouri state court for money owed on a past-due consumer credit card account, an account Main Street purchased from the original creditor. On February 7, 2011, Main Street obtained a default judgment against Plaintiff in the amount of $1, 318.60 plus costs, to be determined by the court. The default judgment was silent as to the recovery of post-judgment interest. On June 22, 2012, as a result of garnishment efforts, Main Street received $745.55 toward the default judgment.

         On August 3, 2015, Frontline sent Plaintiff a collection letter on behalf of Main Street stating that Plaintiff owed an outstanding balance of $1, 210.49. This amount included post-judgment interest on the default judgment. Plaintiff filed the present suit in state court claiming that Defendants violated the FDCPA in that they falsely represented the character and amount of Plaintiff’s debt, and attempted to collect an amount not permitted by law, and that Frontline failed to state the accurate amount of Plaintiff’s debt. Plaintiff bases her allegations, in part, on the inclusion of post-judgment interest in the August 2015 collection letter.[1] Defendants removed the action to this Court on the basis of federal question jurisdiction. Defendants seek partial dismissal of Plaintiff’s complaint to the extent that it is based on the legal theory that under Missouri law, post-judgment interest must be awarded in the judgment in order to be collected.

         The statute at issue, Mo. Rev. Stat. § 408.040, provides, in relevant part, as follows:

1. Judgments shall accrue interest on the judgment balance as set forth in this section. The ‘judgment balance’ is defined as the total amount of the judgment awarded on the day the judgment is entered, including, but not limited to, principal, prejudgment interest, and all costs and fees. . . .
2. In all nontort actions, interest shall be allowed on all money due upon any judgment or order of any court from the date judgment is entered by the trial court until satisfaction be made by payment, accord or sale of property; all such judgments and orders for money upon contracts bearing more than nine percent interest shall bear the same interest borne by such contracts, and all other judgments and orders for money shall bear nine percent per annum until satisfaction made as aforesaid.
3. Notwithstanding the provisions of subsection 2 of this section, in tort actions, interest shall be allowed on all money due upon any judgment or order of any court from the date judgment is entered by the trial court until full satisfaction. All such judgments and orders for money shall bear a per annum interest rate equal to the intended Federal Funds Rate, as established by the Federal Reserve Board, plus five percent, until full satisfaction is made. The judgment shall state the applicable interest rate, which shall not vary once entered.

         Defendants point to the fact that the statute states that “in tort actions . . . [t]he judgment shall state the applicable interest rate [of post-judgment interest to accrue thereon], ” but does not state so with respect to nontort actions. Defendants argue that thus the plain language of the statute establishes that postjudgment interest need not be awarded in the judgment in nontort actions, such as the state court collection action in this case, in order to be collectable.

         Plaintiff argues that while the award of post-judgment interest is mandatory if a party requests it, the statute does not contain any language which creates a right to post-judgment interest in the absence of an award from the court. Plaintiff contends that the requirement that tort judgments state the interest rate is necessary because the applicable tort interest rate can vary day to day, but does not mean that in other cases a party may self-award post-judgment interest.

         DISCUSSION

         The purpose of dismissal under Rule 12(b)(6) is “to eliminate actions which are fatally flawed in their legal premises and deigned to fail, thereby sparing litigants the burden of unnecessary pretrial and trial activity.” Young v. City of St. Charles, 244 F.3d 623, 627 (8th Cir. 2001). The court must accept the plaintiff’s factual allegations as true and construe them in the plaintiff’s favor, but is not required to accept the legal conclusions the plaintiff draws from the facts alleged. A ...


Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.