Court of Appeals of Missouri, Eastern District, Fourth Division
Appeal from the Circuit Court of St. Louis County. Honorable Robert S. Cohen.
Kenneth D. Parker, appellant, Pro se, Tucson, AZ.
Robert J. Bartholomew, Jr., Assistant Attorney General, Jefferson City, MO, for respondent.
Patricia L. Cohen, Presiding Judge. Roy L. Richter, J., and Robert M. Clayton III, J., concur.
Patricia L. Cohen, Presiding Judge.
Kenneth Parker (Defendant) appeals the order entered by the Circuit Court of St. Louis County denying his pro se motion to credit time served toward his sentence. Finding that there is no appealable judgment, we dismiss Defendant's appeal.
Factual and Procedural Background
On August 22, 2013, Defendant pleaded guilty via video conference from a federal penitentiary in Tucson, Arizona to one count of robbery in the first degree and one count of robbery in the second degree. On the same day, the trial court sentenced Defendant to ten years' imprisonment on each count to run concurrently with each other and his federal sentence. Initially, the trial court ordered that Defendant " be credited with all time in custody from September 24, 2010 to today's date [August 22, 2013], to be determined by [Missouri Department of Corrections]." However, the trial court crossed out its order and instead ordered that Defendant " receive credit for all time as is allowed by law." Pursuant to 558.031 RSMo, an officer from St. Louis County Justice Services credited Defendant with 334 days.
On March 10, 2014, Defendant filed a pro se " motion to reopen sentencing." In his motion, Defendant requested the trial court " correct" his sentence and credit his sentence with time served from the date he entered custody until the date of sentencing. On the same day, the trial court denied Defendant's motion. Defendant appeals.
In his first and second point on appeal, Defendant asserts that the trial court erred in failing to credit his prison sentence with time served from the date he went into custody until the date he pleaded guilty. The State contends that we should dismiss Defendant's appeal because: (1) the trial court's order denying Defendant's motion is not an appealable order; (2) Defendant did not file a petition for declaratory judgment under section 558.031.1; (3) Defendant's ...