Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Ford v. State

Court of Appeals of Missouri, Eastern District, Fourth Division

November 25, 2014

HAROLD FORD, Appellant,
v.
STATE OF MISSOURI, Respondent

Appeal from the Circuit Court of St. Louis County. Honorable Colleen Dolan.

Robert W. Lundt, Assistant Public Defender, St. Louis, MO, for appellant.

Robert J. Bartholomew, Jr., Assistant Attorney General, Jefferson City, MO, for respondent.

Before Patricia L. Cohen, P.J., Roy L. Richter, J., and Robert M. Clayton III, J.

OPINION

Per Curiam.

ORDER

Harold Ford (Movant) appeals the judgment of the Circuit Court of St. Louis County denying his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief following an evidentiary hearing. Movant claims that the motion court erred in denying his claims that trial counsel was ineffective in: (1) " laboring under an actual conflict of interest" ; (2) failing to impeach a witness; and (3) failing to call a witness.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude that the motion court's decision to deny Movant's Rule 29.15 motion was not clearly erroneous. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum opinion only for the use of the parties setting forth the reasons for our decision.

We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).


Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.