Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Young v. State

Court of Appeals of Missouri, Eastern District, Fifth Division

September 2, 2014

CINDY I. YOUNG, Movant/Appellant,
v.
STATE OF MISSOURI, Respondent

Appeal from the Circuit Court of Ralls County. Honorable David C. Mobley.

FOR APPELLANT: Mark Grothoff, Columbia, Missouri.

FOR RESPONDENT: Jennifer Rodewald, Jefferson City, Missouri.

Before Angela T. Quigless, C.J., Lisa S. Van Amburg, J., and Gloria Clark Reno, Sp. J.

OPINION

PER CURIAM

ORDER

Cindy Young appeals the judgment of the motion court denying, after an evidentiary hearing, her Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief from her conviction for identity theft.[1]

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal. The findings and conclusions of the motion court are based on findings of fact that are not clearly erroneous. An opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law would have no precedential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum, for their information only, setting forth the reasons for our decision.

We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).


Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.