United States District Court, W.D. Missouri, Western Division
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION
SARAH W. HAYS, Magistrate Judge.
On May 13, 2014, defendant Smith was granted leave to proceed pro se. Pending before the Court are the following documents which have been filed by defendant Smith:
1. Motion to Quash Indictment (doc #29); and
2. Letter Rogatory for Relief Under the Hague Convention Title 28 USC § 1781 (doc #37).
On April 2, 1997, defendant James T. Smith was sentenced in the Western District of
Wisconsin for the offense of Bank Robbery by Force or Violence. The sentence imposed was 210 months in custody followed by 36 months of supervised release. Defendant's term of supervised release began on April 23, 2012 and was to expire on April 22, 2015. On March 12, 2013, jurisdiction of the supervised release case was transferred from the Western District of Wisconsin to the Western District of Missouri. This case, 13-00061-01-CR-W-DW, was assigned to the Honorable Dean Whipple.
On May 20, 2013, a Violation Report was filed in Case No. 13-00061. The Violation Report stated that on May 19, 2013, troopers with the Missouri State Highway Patrol were notified that defendant Smith attempted to rob the Isle of Capri Casino. A mandatory condition of defendant Smith's supervised release was that "[t]he defendant shall not commit another federal, state or local crime." A warrant for the arrest of supervised releasee was issued for defendant Smith. Defendant Smith first appeared in the supervised release case (Case No. 13-00061) before United States Magistrate Judge Robert E. Larsen on May 21, 2013.
On April 29, 2014, a two-count Indictment in the instant case was filed. Count One of the Indictment charges that on May 18, 2013, defendant Smith committed bank robbery, taking money in the amount of $1, 053.00 from a teller at Commerce Bank, 118 West 47th Street, Kansas City, Missouri. Count Two charges that on May 19, 2013, defendant Smith attempted to rob the Isle of Capri Casino.
The two pro se filings currently before the Court seek the dismissal of the instant case.
The Court will address each of these filings.
A. Motion to Quash Indictment
In this motion, defendant Smith states that this controversy has been terminated based on the acquiescence of the prosecution and court for failing to respond to defendant's jurisdictional challenges in defendant's Affidavit of Facts and Call for Response (doc #28 in Case No. 13-00061), Notice of Fault Opportunity to Cure Affidavit of Facts and Call for Response (doc #38 in Case No. 13-00061) and Notice of ...