Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Burrell v. State

Court of Appeals of Missouri, Eastern District, Fourth Division

August 19, 2014

EUGENE BURRELL, Movant/Appellant,
v.
STATE OF MISSOURI, Respondent

Appeal from the City of St. Louis Circuit Court. Honorable Margaret M. Neill.

FOR APPELLANT: Maleaner R. Harvey, Missouri Public Defenders Office, St. Louis, Missouri.

FOR RESPONDENT: Shaun J. Mackelprang, Assistant Attorney General, Jefferson City, Missouri.

Before Lisa S. Van Amburg, P.J., Patricia L. Cohen, J., and Philip M. Hess, J.

OPINION

PER CURIAM

ORDER

Eugene Burrell (Movant) appeals the motion court's denial of his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief without an evidentiary hearing. Movant contends that his trial attorneys were ineffective for: (1) failing to request a lesser-included offense jury instruction; (2) failing to offer a modified version of the self-defense instruction; and (3) failing to make adequate offers of proof at trial regarding his videotaped statement to police and a 911 call. We affirm.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find that the motion court did not clearly err in denying post-conviction relief. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum opinion only for the use of the parties setting forth the reasons for our decision. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).


Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.