Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

United States v. Craddock

United States District Court, W.D. Missouri, Western Division

July 30, 2014

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff,
v.
MEIGEL M. CRADDOCK, Defendant.

ORDER

DEAN WHIPPLE, District Judge.

Before the Court is the Report and Recommendation (Doc. 26) submitted by Magistrate Judge Robert E. Larsen regarding Defendant's Motion to Suppress Evidence with Suggestions (Doc. 17). Defendant filed Objections to the Magistrate's Report and Recommendation (Doc. 37). Pursuant to Rule 59(b)(3) of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure, the district judge must consider de novo any objection to the magistrate judge's recommendation. After an independent review of the record, the applicable law, and Defendant's objections, the Court adopts the Magistrate's findings of fact and conclusions of law and accepts the recommendation.

Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that:

1) The Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation (Doc. 26) be attached to and made a part of this Order; and
2) Defendant's Motion to Suppress Evidence (Doc. 17) is DENIED.

SO ORDERED.


Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.