Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

10/12/93 TIMOTHY TOWNSEND v. STATE MISSOURI

October 12, 1993

TIMOTHY TOWNSEND, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF MISSOURI, RESPONDENT.



Appeal from the Circuit Court of Washington County. Hon. Stanley J. Murphy.

Before William H. Crandall, Jr., P.j.; James R. Reinhard and Robert E. Crist, JJ.

The opinion of the court was delivered by: Per Curiam

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

We find Defendant is not entitled to plain error review of issues not raised in his Rule 24.035 motion. Further, we find no error of law appears and the findings of fact issued by the motion court in overruling Defendant's 24.035 motion were not clearly erroneous.

An opinion in this case would serve no precedential purpose; therefore, we affirm by written order. Rule 84.16(b). A memorandum has been issued to the parties for their use only.

19931012

© 1997 VersusLaw ...

Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.